Compare Criterion Definitions

Definitions of "Accessibility"

22 definitions found across 22 frameworks

Framework Definition Notes
KGHeartBeat: a Knowledge Graph Quality Assessment Tool
2024
Quality dimension from KGHeartBeat: a Knowledge Graph Quality Assessment Tool (2024)
KGHeartBeat: a Knowledge Graph Quality Assessment Tool
2024
An open-source tool for periodically evaluating the quality of KGs. (2024)
Quality Without Borders: A Modular Approach to Unified Knowledge Graph Assessment
2024
Quality dimension from Quality Without Borders: A Modular Approach to Unified Knowledge Graph Assessment (2024)
Quality Without Borders: A Modular Approach to Unified Knowledge Graph Assessment
2024
Proposes a comprehensive Shared Framework to formally align KG-specific quality metrics, FAIR principles, and the 5-star open data scheme. (2024)
KGMM -A Maturity Model for Scholarly Knowledge Graphs based on Intertwined Human-Machine Collaboration
2022
Quality dimension from KGMM -A Maturity Model for Scholarly Knowledge Graphs based on Intertwined Human-Machine Collaboration (2022)
KGMM -A Maturity Model for Scholarly Knowledge Graphs based on Intertwined Human-Machine Collaboration
2022
Proposes the Knowledge Graph Maturity Model (KGMM) as a structured framework for evaluating KG maturity across five levels. (2022)
Introducing the Data Quality Vocabulary (DQV)
2021
Quality dimension from Introducing the Data Quality Vocabulary (DQV) (2021)
Introducing the Data Quality Vocabulary (DQV)
2021
Defines the W3C standardized vocabulary for describing quality metadata in a machine-readable format. (2021)
A Scalable Framework for Quality Assessment of RDF Datasets.
2020
Quality dimension from A Scalable Framework for Quality Assessment of RDF Datasets. (2020)
A Scalable Framework for Quality Assessment of RDF Datasets.
2020
Presents an open source implementation of quality assessment of large RDF datasets that can scale out to a cluster of machines. (2020)
F-UJI and FAIR-Checker: Automated FAIR Data Assessment Tools
2020
Quality dimension from F-UJI and FAIR-Checker: Automated FAIR Data Assessment Tools (2020)
F-UJI and FAIR-Checker: Automated FAIR Data Assessment Tools
2020
F-UJI and FAIR-Checker are automated tools that operationalize FAIR principles for data and metadata evaluation. They test digital resources against Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable criteria and provide compliance scoring and actionable improvement recommendations. (2020)
FAIR Data Maturity Model: specification and guidelines
2020
Quality dimension from FAIR Data Maturity Model: specification and guidelines (2020)
FAIR Data Maturity Model: specification and guidelines
2020
Establishes a common set of core assessment criteria and maturity levels for evaluating FAIRness. (2020)
ISO/IEC 25012 Data Quality Model
2014
Quality dimension from ISO/IEC 25012 Data Quality Model (2014)
ISO/IEC 25012 Data Quality Model
2014
Defines 15 data quality characteristics categorized by Inherent (data itself) and System-Dependent (data quality preserved in a computer system) viewpoints. (2014)
Linked Data – Design Issues.
2006
Quality dimension from Linked Data – Design Issues. (2006)
Linked Data – Design Issues.
2006
The document outlines the fundamental design principles behind Linked Data on the Web. It proposes a set of rules for how data should be identified, accessed, described, and linked to other resources to enable a global web of data. These ideas became the cornerstone of the Semantic Web and inspired many later frameworks for data and knowledge graph quality. (2006)
Data Quality in Context
1997
Quality dimension from Data Quality in Context (1997)
Data Quality in Context
1997
Seminal work discussing data quality across various dimensions in organizational contexts. (1997)
Beyond Accuracy: What data quality means to Data Consumers
1996
Quality dimension from Beyond Accuracy: What data quality means to Data Consumers (1996)
Beyond Accuracy: What data quality means to Data Consumers
1996
Shifted the focus of data quality discussions beyond mere accuracy to a broader contextual understanding of data quality for consumers. (1996)